| RegNet Home | Search RegNet Program |
The Australian National University
Regulatory Institutions Network (RegNet)
ANU COLLEGE OF ASIA AND THE PACIFIC
Printer Friendly Version of this Document

 

RegNet Newsletter
Vol. III, No.4
September 2003

UPCOMING REGNET EVENTS

 

Printer friendly

REGNET CONFERENCE

WORKSHOP

SEMINARS

NEW REGNET CENTRE

CONGRATULATIONS

PROJECTS

ANU GAMBLING RESEARCH CENTRE

OTHER NEW APPOINTMENTS TO REGNET, RSSS

REGNET PROFILES

NEW REGNET BUILDING

RegNet Conference
The Nodal and the Global
9-11 December
2003
Innovations Building

Eggleston Road
The Australian National University
Canberra ACT 0200


A First Annual Conference: The Regulatory Institutions Network will have an annual conference in the second week of December every year. Starting next year, these will be more traditional conferences for which there will be a registration fee and a general call for papers. Registration is free this year. Because RegNet has had such huge growth in the number of RegNet faculty in the Research School of Social Sciences at ANU, this year's conference will be mainly dedicated to RegNet RSSS people listening to each other, finding out what points of connection we should be better exploring, with just two set piece papers from overseas stars. The locals will not be presenting formal papers. Instead they have been clustered into eight groups to lead conversations about the ideas they are working on.

Tuesday 9 December

 

4.30 pm Registration and coffee

 

5.00 - 6.15 pm

 

John Braithwaite

Welcome

Doreen McBarnet, Oxford

Regulating Global Business: New Mechanisms of Control

 

6.15 - 7.30 pm Drinks and Nibbles

 

 
Wednesday 10 December
9.00 am

 

Clifford Shearing

Introduction to the Nodal and the Global


Conversation Leaders

:Jennifer Wood, Monique Marks, Jenny Fleming, Peter Grabosky, Clifford Shearing

Nodal Security

 

 

10.00 am Morning Tea

 

 
11.00 am

Conversation Leaders:

Heather Strang, Lawrence Sherman, Eliza Ahmed

Restorative Justice

 

 

12.30 - 1.30pm Lunch

 

 
3.30 - 5.00 pm

Conversation Leaders

Peter Drahos, Matt Rimmer, Janet Hope and Geertrui Van Oveerwalle

Global and Nodal Information

 

5.00 - 6.00 pm Drinks and Nibbles

 

 
Thursday 11 December
9.00 - 9.30 am

 

Reuven Avi Yonah, University of MichiganCorporations

Society and the State: A Defense of the Corporate Tax

 

9.30 - 11.00 am

Conversation Leaders

Valerie Braithwaite, Tina Murphy, Michael Wenzel, Greg Rawlings, Jenny Job

Tax System Integrity

 

11.00 - 11.30am Morning Tea

 

11.30am - 1.00 pm

 

Conversation Leaders

Peter Drahos, Christine Parker, David Levi-Faur, Vij Nagarajan, Natalie Stepanenko

Competition and Consumer Policy

 

1.00 - 1.45 pm Lunch

 

 
1.45 pm - 3.15 pm

Conversation Leaders

Richard Johnstone, Neil Gunningham, Andrew Hopkins, Liz Bluff

Occupational Health and Safety

 

 
 
3.45 - 5.15 pm

Conversation Leaders

Sascha Courville, Helen Watchirs, Nicola Piper, Robyn Bartel

Applying Global Standards at the Local Level

 
5.15 - 5.30 pm

 

Michael Dowdle

Departing suggestions for the future RegNet Research Agenda

REGISTRATION FORM

top


Workshop

Thursday 9- Friday 10 October, 9am – 5pm

'The Future of Ecolabelling in Australia’

The Australian Academy of Science Shine Dome
The Australian National University
Canberra ACT 0200

top


Seminars

September


"Towards an Analytics of Trends in Governance: The Case of Policing Reform in Northern Ireland"
Michael Kempa (PhD Scholar, Mid-Term review, RegNet)
Tuesday, 23 September, 2pm
Note: Seminar Room F

"Transforming Armed Intervention: Redefining the Rules and Reshaping Deployment as a force for good"
Peter Reddy (PhD Scholar, 6 monthly review, RegNet)
Wednesday, 24 September, 2pm
Note: Seminar Room E

"Protecting Australia's Fossil Heritage"
Jodie Houston (PhD Scholar, Mid-Term review, RegNet)
Thursday, 25 September, 2pm
Note: Seminar Room E

"The Diffusion of Community Policing"
Jimmy Fan (PhD Scholar, 6 monthly review, RegNet)
Monday, 29 September, 2pm
Note: Seminar Room F

"Why we urgently need a proper, working systemic model of the Australian federal tax system"
Michael Inglis (Tax Barrister)
Tuesday, 30 September, 1.30 pm
Note: Seminar Room A

October

"The interface of inspection and regulation: prison inspection in Western Australia."
Professor Richard Harding (Office of the Inspector of Custodial Services, WA)
Tuesday, 7 October, 2pm
Note: Seminar Room F


"The community governance of crime, disorder and the anti-social: instabilities of the modernisation project in the UK"
Gordon Hughes (Criminologist, UK)
Tuesday, 14 October, 2pm
Note: Seminar Room F

"Online Privacy in the
Workplace"
Kathy Eivazi (PhD Scholar, 6 monthly review, ANU)
Tuesday, 28 October, 11am
Note: Seminar Room D

"TBA"
Geoff Stewart-Richardson (PhD Scholar, 6 monthly review, ANU)
Thursday, 30 October, 2pm
Note: Seminar Room D


November


"Post violence as a sociological issue"
John Brewer (Professor of Sociology at Queen's University, Belfast)
Tuesday, 4 November, 2pm
Note: Seminar Room C

"TBA"
Anthony Krone
Tuesday, 18 November, 2pm
Note: Seminar Room E

"TBA"
Zein Kebonang (PhD Scholar, review, ANU)
Wednesday, 19 November, 2pm
Note: Seminar Room E

"TBA"
Miranda Forsyth (University of South Pacific, School of Law)
Monday, 24 November, 2pm
Note: Seminar Room E

"TBA"
Alexander George (PhD Scholar, Mid-Term review, UK)
Tuesday, 25 November, 2pm
Note: Seminar Room E

"TBA"
Waanda McCarthy (PhD Scholar, 6 monthly review, RegNet)
Tuesday 2 December, 11am
Note: Seminar Room E

top


NEW REGNET CENTRE

The Australian Centre of Regulatory Economics (ACORE) will be initiated next year as a new Centre within RegNet in the ANU Faculty of Economics, providing a unique research and education program bringing together world-class experts to undertake the most extensive program of research on economic regulation in Australia.

It will also introduce three new types of postgraduate programs including intensive Summer School courses on selected topics for senior staff of regulatory bodies and industry, providing an education program that is currently unavailable.

This joint initiative comprises Australian regulatory agencies, organisations that are subject to regulation and the ANU.

top

CONGRATULATIONS

Dr Nicola Piper has been promoted from Research Fellow to Fellow.

Dr Valerie Braithwaite was awarded the ANU's Certificate in Recognition of Exceptional Performance in Equity and Diversity.

Professor Peter Drahos was appointed Temporary Advisor to the World Health Organization and in that capacity went to the Expert Meeting on Improving Access to Essential Medicines in the Western Pacific Region that was organized by the World Health Organization and held in Penang on 15-17 July. Amongst other things, the meeting examined the possible impacts of trade globalization on access to essential medicines in the Western Pacific region. Professor Drahos gave a presentation on intellectual property
rights and access to medicines. He was also the rapporter for the meeting. The meeting produced a draft strategic plan entitled 'Improving Access and Affordability of Essential Medicines in the Western Pacific
Region of the World Health Organization'.

Professor Philip Petitt(Philosophy/Social and Political Theory) was recipient of the Centenary of Federation Medal.

top


PROJECTS

Nicola Piper

Under the auspices of UNESCO, I have been commissioned to identify the obstacles to signing the UN Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families from 1990 (Professor Robyn Iredale, director of the Asia Pacific Migration Research Network, University of Wollongong, is the project coordinator). The goals are to encourage dialogue in the region among researchers, policy makers and NGOs; to promote understanding of the major social, economic and political obstacles that prevent countries from signing the Convention; and to develop policy options to encourage governments to sign the Convention. The project involved fieldwork in seven countries within the Asia Pacific region (New Zealand, Singapore, Indonesia, Malaysia, Bangladesh, Japan and Korea) and the 'data collecting phase' has just been completed involving interviews with a variety of stakeholders on the issues of migrant workers and human rights.

The final outcome of this project is the compilation of a report on the reasons for countries not signing the Convention with recommendations which will be used for developing the second phase of this project, a Plan of Action. The report is to be completed by July 2003 and will be made available to the wider public on UNESCO's website.

top

ANU GAMBLING RESEARCH CENTRE
Activities May-August 2003

CURRENT FUNDED RESEARCH

Professor Jan McMillen
· (with Dr David Marshall) Study of the Development of Internet/interactive Gambling and Sportsbetting - ARC Strategic Partnership Industry Research Training (SPIRT) grant.
· Protecting Community Interest and Building Corporate Integrity in the Queensland Gambling Industry - with the Key Centre for Ethics, Law, Justice and Governance (KCELJAG), Griffith University. Funded by Queensland Treasury.
· (with Dr David Marshall, Dr Eliza Ahmed and Dr Michael Wenzel) Longitudinal Community Attitudes Survey and Validation of the Victorian Gambling Screen. Funded by the Victorian Gambling Research Panel.
· Concept Testing and Market Research for the Responsible Gambling Communication Strategy. Expert adviser to ACNielsen. Funded by Queensland Treasury.
· 3hr Shutdown Impact Evaluation- NSW Clubs. Expert adviser to ACNielsen. Funded by NSW Department of Gaming and Racing (completed June 2003).

Professor Peter Grabosky
· (with Julie Lahn) Gambling and Clients of ACT Corrections. Funded by the ACT Gambling and Racing Commission. Completed and Final Report submitted 30 June 2003.
· (with Julie Lahn and Dr Paul Delfabbro, Flinders University) Adolescent Gambling - Prevalence, Risk Factors and Opportunities for Controls and Interventions. ARC Linkages Grant, in partnership with ACT Gambling and Racing Commission.

top

OTHER NEW APPOINTMENTS TO REGNET, RSSS

Jenny Fleming is a Fellow located in the Security 21 project, part of the Regulatory Institutions Network. Her Ph.D. in public policy is from Griffith University, QLD (1998). Her previous research appointment was with the Key Centre for Ethics, Law, Justice and Governance at Griffith University where she examined the regulation of ministerial behaviour in Australia and overseas and institutional value systems. Her research interests include: the politics of police management, police reform, police unionism, public sector management, organisational culture and police labour issues.

Jimmy Fan, joined the Singapore Police Force in 1997 after graduating with a bachelor degree in Sociology and Philosophy from the National University of Singapore, Singapore. After 4 years with the 'men in blue', left for Britain where he completed his MSc degree in Criminal Justice Policy at the London School of Economics and Political Science in 2002. Thereafter, he went home to Singapore before coming over to join RegNet in 2003.

Tali Gal, after graduating the Law School at the Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Tali has been a children's rights advocate since 1996, first as a director of a child-victim assistance project and later as the legal advisor of a non governmental organization in Israel. Tali was also a co-founder and a member of the Israeli Victims' Rights Coalition. After completing her LLM thesis on child-victims, she taught a course on victims' rights at Ramat Gan Law College, Israel.

Tony Foley's background is as a practising solicitor and he now teaches in the Practical Legal Training program in the Law Faculty. His interest is in the potential for the use of restorative justice practices in the legal system.

Fiona Harris, has a Diploma in Law through the Legal Practitioners Admission Board (completed in 1996), a Graduate Diploma in Legal Practice through the College of Law (completed in 1997) and a Masters in Criminology with distinction through the University of Western Sydney (completed in 2002). She has practised as a solicitor for close to five years mainly in the area of common law claims for injured workers.

Peter Reddy, About four years ago Peter decided to take a year's break from the stresses of over a decade involved in business, in the training and employment services sector, and complete a law degree. During this course he chanced upon criminology, completed a Master's and by then the study bug was 'embedded'. His earlier working life was spent in the military and his later activism in both human rights and politics has lead to his current thesis research in war crimes.

Monique Marks,comes to us from the University of Natal, South Africa where she was a senior lecturer in the Sociology Program. She is currently interested in issues of police organisational change and police labour relations and hopes to develop a deeper interest into the areas of governance of security.

David Marshall, is a postdoctoral research fellow in RegNet’s Centre for Gambling Studies, a field in which he has been involved since 1996. He has a BA (Honours) from Flinders University and a PhD from the University of New England. David's research agenda has mainly focused on the social, economic and regulatory aspects of gambling proliferation in Australia, particularlyelectronic gaming machines .

Waanda McCarthy, In 2003 Waanda was associate to Justice Mary Gaudron on the High Court. Previously to that she was in private practice as a barrister in Queensland and a member of a Community Corrections Board.

Jan McMillen, has recently been appointed as Director, Centre for Gambling Research, RegNet. Jan previously held the position as Australia’s first Professor of gambling research at the University of Western Sydney. As Director of the former Australian Institute for Gambling Research she established a reputation as a national and international leader in the analysis of gambling policy and regulation, the study of gambling impacts and social policy.

Jan has conducted multidisciplinary gambling research in all Australian states/territories and overseas where she has developed a collaborative relationship with regulators, industry providers and community groups. Current research includes analysis of the ethics of gambling regulation and industry governance, and a three-year study of internet gambling.

Jan has also held statutory appointments to two independent Gaming Commissions (Victoria 1991-93, and Queensland 1991-2002). These positions have given her a unique and detailed understanding of the legislated and social responsibilities of gambling operators, and the practical aspects of gaming policy and regulation.

Linda Rasmussen, finished a Postdoc appointment on Medieval History at the University of Southern Denmark 2000-2002 after completing a PhD,also on Medieval History, at ANU in 2000 .

Sascha Walkley, has completed a BA (Criminology) and Honors at the University of Western Sydney. During my PhD, I tutored part-time for 2 years in criminology and lectured for 1 semester on a subject: Computer, Corporate and Cyber Crime. I was a Postgraduate representative on the Academic Senate and Research Studies Committee. Sascha is also a member of the ABC Advisory Council.

Helen Watchirs has had her 1 year postdoc on ADIS audit, supported jointly by the AIDS trust and RegNet, extended to a second year.

Jennifer Wood, Research Fellow in Security 21. Has already been visiting with us for much of 2002 and will arrive in late 2003 from the University of Toronto this time into a salaried RegNet appointment.

top

REGNET PROFILES

Michael Dowdle

Michael works on issues of Chinese and comparative constitutional and public law development. He has taught at Columbia University, New York University, and Beijing University; and for the summer of 2002 was appointed to the Qinghua (Tsinghua) University Law Faculty as the Himalayas Foundation Distinguished Visiting Professor in comparative constitutional law. Over the past year (2002), he has been invited to lecture at the University of Oxford Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, the Harvard Law School, the Columbia Law School, the University of Leiden Department of Public Administration, the Fairbank Center for East Asian Research of Harvard University, the Columbia University East Asian Institute, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, and the American Embassy in Beijing. He has served as a consultant on legal and constitutional development projects for the United States Department of State, the Canadian Foreign Ministry, the Ford Foundation, and the China Securities Regulatory Commission. A member of the New York bar, he has worked pro bono for the American Civil Liberties Union, the Center for Reproductive Law and Policy, and the North American China Coordination Group of Amnesty International.

Peter Grabosky

Peter Grabosky holds a Ph.D. in Political Science from Northwestern University, and has written extensively on criminal justice and public policy. His general interests are in harnessing resources outside the public sector in furtherance of public administration, the use of incentives and inducements as regulatory instruments. He was previously Deputy Director of the Australian Institute of Criminology, and has held a number of visiting appointments in the United States, Japan and China. He was rapporteur for the Workshop on Crimes Related to the Computer Network at the Tenth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Vienna, 2000. From 1998 - 2000 he was President of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Criminology. In 1999 he was elected to the Board of Directors, and Deputy Secretary General, of the International Society of Criminology.

Richard Johnstone

Richard Johnstone is Director of the National Research Centre for Occupational Health and Safety Regulation. He also has a 50 per cent professorial appointment in the Faculty of Law, at Griffith University, where he directs the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation Research Unit and is a Co-Director of the Socio-Legal Research . His empirical research into OHS regulation has focused principally on OHS enforcement, with a major study on OHS prosecution in Victoria, which has just
been published Occupational Health and Safety, Courts and Crime, Federation Press, 2003, and smaller studies on enforcement in New South Wales, and in the construction industry in Queensland. Recently he has begun to work on compliance with OHS regulation. This work began with a small study on OHS work plans in Queensland, and will continue with ARC-funded studies into compliance with OHS, anti-discrimination and dismissal law.

With Neil Gunningham, Richard has conducted major policy studies for the National Occupational Health and Safety Commission, the Department of Minerals and Energy, New South Wales and the WorkCover Authority of New South Wales. The WorkCover Authority of New South Wales study was further developed, and was published as Regulating Workplace Safety: Systems and Sanctions, in the Oxford Socio-Legal Studies Series in 1999. Richard has also published a leading general text, Occupational Health and Safety Law and Policy (LBC, 1997), and is currently working on a second edition. Recently he has shifted his attention to the regulation of OHS in non-employment relationships, including work on road freight, contractors and sub-contractors, labour hire, and franchise arrangements.

He has also published five books and a dozen articles or chapters on various aspects of law teaching. Each of these publications has been the result of a genuine engagement with educational theory and research.

Flavio Menezes

Flavio Menezes is Reader in Economics at the School of Economics at the ANU. He has published widely in theory of auctions and is regarded as Australasian's leading auction expert. This expertise is essential for navigating the waves of the new regulatory regimes that followed the restructuring of major infrastructure industries in Australia and around the world. It is widely understood now that in many situations (e.g., access) auctions are the appropriate pricing mechanism. However, one cannot simply apply auction theory without knowing all the caveats. In addition, several existing markets (e.g., spot electricity markets) can be better understood by using auction theory. Flavio Menezes has extensive teaching experience in the areas of game theory, industrial organization and on the theory of incentives (the foundation of modern economic regulatory theory). He has presented seminars and delivered lectures in the Americas, Europe and in the Asia Pacific Region. He has lectured to both academic audiences and practitioners. Flavio Menezes has lectured on auction theory to treasury officials, general audiences and staff of consulting firms.

Flavio Menezes has also a very rich consulting experience. Overseas consulting includes being the main advisor on the determination of the privatisation model for Furnas (the largest electricity utility in Brazil), advising the Brazilian government on electricity regulatory reform, and on reviewing the Brazilian government procurement practices. Consulting experience in Australia include advising ACCC on tendering and bidding for access and reviewing a Productivity Commission report on the role of auctions to allocate public resources.

Helen Watchirs

Helen Watchirs is a post-doctoral fellow in RegNet at RSSS, having been awarded an AIDS Trust of Australia, Jonathan Mann Health and Human Rights scholarship. She has a BA and LLB from the University of Sydney, and a Masters of Public Law and PhD from the Australian National University. Her research interest is in health and human rights law, and she is currently piloting a tripartite human rights and HIV/AIDS audit in Australia. She first developed the human rights audit methodology in the mental health area for the Australian Health Minister's Advisory Council, National Mental Health Working Group. Over the last twenty years Helen has worked as a human rights lawyer for the Australian government in Canberra, and UNAIDS in Geneva. In 1992 she was awarded a WHO Fellowship based at the Harvard/WHO Collaborating Centre on Health Legislation. Helen managed an intergovernmental HIV/AIDS law reform project, and wrote the draft text of the International Guidelines on HIV/AIDS and Human Rights in 1996. She has been a part-time legal member of the Social Security Appeals Tribunal from 1997-2002. In 2002 she was a rapporteur at the 14th International AIDS Conference in Barcelona. She has written extensively on HIV/AIDS and human rights issues, such as discrimination, public health, criminal law and privacy and has served as an expert on working groups and a consultant for various UN agencies, including the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, UNAIDS, WHO, ILO and UNDP.

top

WORKSHOPS

 

The National OHS Regulatory Research Consortium

4-5 February 2003

The National OHS Regulatory Research Consortium was established by RegNet's National Research Centre for OHS Regulation to foster, develop and support an interdisciplinary collaborative network of Australian researchers interested in OHS regulation. The aim is to increase the amount of high quality evidence-based and policy focused research into OHS regulation. The Centre provides the administrative support for the Consortium, maintains an email discussion list for members, convenes an annual OHS regulatory research workshop at which Consortium members present and discuss their work in progress, promotes OHS regulatory research seminar groups in each major Australian city, and works with the National Occupational Health and Safety Commission (NOHSC) and other organisations to hold conferences on OHS regulation. Information about consortium members and their research interests and output can be found at http://www.ohs.anu.edu.au. In the longer term the Centre and the Consortium will be working towards creating research centres specialising in OHS regulation in other Australian cities. An OHS Regulatory Research Unit has already been established within the Socio-Legal Research Centre in the Law School at Griffith University.
At it's first regulatory research workshop in February 2003, topics of research in progress presented by consortium members included:
(1) OHS consultation and representation in the metalliferous mining industry in Australia; (2) risk management in the mining industry; (3) the OHS and associate challenges of precarious employment;
(4) the implementation of process regulation in OHS: a comparative study of policy and practice;
(5) OHS enforcement in Australia;(6) an analysis of responses to constitutive regulation of working relationships;(7) duty holder responses to enforcement of workplace health and safety legislation in Queensland; (8) OHS in the design and manufacture of plant; (9) flexible systems for OHS management; (10) understanding context in the globalisation of OHS standards; (11) a social theory and action perspective of disability; (12) long-term ethylene oxide exposure trends in US hospitals and OSHA regulatory activity; (13) regulating pesticide safety; (14) occupational violence/bullying in the maritime industry; (15) OHS legislation and workers driving light fleet vehicles;(16) using the voice of contingent workers to improve workplace health and safety; (17) an action research program to establish an OHS infrastructure for East Timor;(18) investigating strategies to minimise the impact of work on health;and(19) evaluation of OHS educational interventions in Queensland workplaces.

top

Auditing in Perspective: Regulatory Tool, Moribund Remedy or Democratic Champion?

6 February 2003

The Workshop held on 6 February 2003 at the ANU Innovations Building was by all accounts a successful venture. The keynote speaker was Professor Mike Power from the Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation at the London School of Economics. He spoke on evaluating the audit explosion, based on his 1997 book, The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Over a hundred people registered from a range of disciplines and work backgrounds – academic, public service, private practice and NGOs. The National Institute of Government and Law assisted with funding and printing a Workshop pamphlet that was instrumental in gaining such a good response.

The Workshop had three substantive sessions and a discussants’ panel. The first session examined accountability for democratic governance and the speakers were Sasha Courville on social audits, Marion Sawer on democratic audits and Helen Watchirs on human rights audits. The second session discussed meta-regulating compliance and the speakers were Christine Parker on corporate compliance, Keith Houghton on corporate auditing and Roger Burritt on environmental auditing. The third session covered public sector regulation and the speakers were Colin Scott on Australian issues, Peter Wilkins on international experiences and Fiona Tito on clinical audits and consumer perspectives.

The Workshop was deliberately designed to encourage lively debate among participants, by giving adequate time for audience questions after each speaker session and the discussants panel. Many participants also took the opportunity to hear the keynote speaker deliver another paper the following day on ‘Risk Management and Corporate Social Responsibility’ that was co-sponsored by NIGL, the Australian National Centre for Audit and Assurance Research and RegNet.

top

Regulating Law Workshop

20-22 March 2003

The Regulating Law workshop was organised by RegNet members, John Braithwaite, Nicola Lacey, Christine Parker and Colin Scott to investigate the double aspect of 'regulating law' - how law regulates and is regulated. We hypothesised that it might be useful to apply a regulatory 'lens' to the main areas of legal doctrine in the law school curriculums of the common law countries. To that end we invited leading scholars in the areas of contract law (Hugh Collins), financial services law (Julia Black), corporate governance (Angus Corbett and Stephen Bottomley), family law (John Dewar), labour law (Richard Johnstone and Richard Mitchell), torts (Jane Stapleton), trusts and fiduciaries (Susanne Corcoran and Paul Finn), criminal law (Nicola Lacey), property law (Peter Drahos), competition law (Imelda Maher), administrative law (Peter Cane), constitutional law (Colin Scott) , and international law (Hilary Charlesworth and Christine Chinkin) to present papers reflecting on the relationship between law and regulation in their areas.

Hugh Collins' book, Regulating Contracts (Oxford University press, 1999) was used as a model and testing ground for the way in which regulatory and legal doctrinal analysis might be intertwined. The presentations, Collins' Regulating Contracts and the (much maligned) issues paper previously prepared by the editors provoked much lively discussion and controversy over the difference, if any, between law and regulation, the possibility of applying a 'regulatory lens' to law, and the meaning and scope of regulation. In some areas of doctrine, such as tort and trusts, presenters thought it was quite difficult to find clear regulatory purposes. In others, presenters argued it was impossible to separate them, and perhaps insignificant to comment on the relationship between. Nevertheless the papers provided insight into the way that different areas of law with different levels of regulatory intent interact, and interfere, with one another.

Overall the presenters applied a regulatory lens to law in three different, but overlapping ways. Hugh Collins' min-keynote at the beginning of the workshop helped us all to clarify these. The first involves a dialogue between lawyers and regulationists about the questions and methodologies in their respective areas of scholarship and how they do and can intersect. The second involves the consideration of the varying regulatory purposes or orientations of different areas of law and how they interconnect and compete with each other. The third focuses on how law (seen overall as just one form of regulation in society) interacts with other forms of regulation or normative ordering.

The papers will be published as an edited collection under the title, Regulating Law in 2004 by Oxford University Press. The organisers would like to thank Leah Dunn, Natalie Stepanenko and especially Bron Stuart for their hard work in organising the workshop.

top

Building a Global Competition Culture:The Role of Civil Society, Business & Government

22 July 2003

Good competition policy and regulation, in concert with good consumer protection policy and regulation, has contributed markedly in many countries directly to consumer welfare and to economic performance generally. Countries with developing economies and economies in transition are building their capacities in these areas of governance, but need substantial technical assistance. In addition the extent to which they and developed economy countries can maximize the benefits of economic globalisation is compromised by cross-border anti-competitive arrangements and conduct, particularly international cartels. The forthcoming WTO talks in Cancun will discuss the potential contribution of a multilateral agreement on competition. But, a large number of countries are concerned that many complex issues need to be resolved before any kind of agreement can be contemplated. In part this can be attributed to the limited capacity in competition policy, law and regulation in many countries. The WTO, UNCTAD, the European Commission and other bodies, including bilateral development cooperation agencies, are taking steps to assist capacity building in these countries.
This seminar has brought together a number of key policy, business, civil society and academic people from Australia and countries in the region to share information and ideas.

'Trade and Competition: The Links', Jane Drake-Brockman, Convenor, Australian Services Roundtable

'How Smaller Nations Can Make the WTO System Work in their Interest', Peter Drahos, ANU

'A Global Competition Policy: A Role for Civil Society' , Imelda Maher, CCCP & Robin Brown, FEMAG.

'Social & Environmental Standards: A Case Study or Regulating Internationally and Implementing Locally', Sasha Courville, SASA

Papers helped to inform participants on:
• the possible scope of the multi-lateral agreement and the different perspectives on
controversial issues;
• developments in the various international forums on competition policy and regulation emergence of new forms and networks and efforts being taken to build common ground;
• the interaction between trade and competition and the particular relevance of competition policy to trade in services;
• research on competition policy and regulation in countries with developing economies and economies in transition and the reasons some are making slower progress than others;
• the roles government, business and civil society must play, the critical need for a common knowledge base amongst them and for tripartite dialogue and collaboration at national and global levels for accelerated progress; and
• the under-appreciation of advocacy in civil society (especially the consumer movement) as a contributor to constituency building for competition policy development and to the protection of the independence of regulatory agencies. Roundtable discussions was held under Chatham House rules to ensure maximum opportunity for a free exchange of views.

top

The International Workshop on the Rights of Migrant Workers

6-7 August 2003

The workshop was opened by Professor Michael Coper, the Dean of Law and Convenor of NISSL) who noted the common theme in the story of the migrant worker worldwide is the tension between the hope of a better life, on the one hand, and the fear of exploitation on the other. He went on to draw out the balance of interests and whether rights are best achieved through the legislative process or through the courts, or indeed through some symbiotic partnership between these and perhaps other institutions. Finally he concluded with the observation that sociological analysis of the actual experiences and needs of migrant workers was indispensable to legal approaches if practical solutions were to emerge.

Nicola Piper provided a Snapshot of migration and rights issues in the Asia Pacific region" outlining of the emerging trends and issues revolving around contemporary cross-border labour migration and migrants' rights in the Asia Pacific region. Using as case studies Bangladesh, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, New Zealand, and Singapore. Contemporary forms of labour migration are characterised by
1) increasing participation of women,
2) increasing regionalisation, and
3) obstacles to long-term residence, let alone settlement due to short term contracts being of unauthorised nature.
Dr Piper concluded by noting that the gap between governmental policies and migration reality is widening and abusive practices are rampant. While NGOs have taken an important role of service providers and rights' advocates, engaging in transnational networking as best as they can on the basis of their limited resources, there is much more to do.

The following three papers and discussion all picked up on the key point raised by Dr. Piper through case studies. Mary Lou Alcid spoke from the perspective of the Migrant Forum of Asia and the challenges they face promoting Asian migrant workers' rights and their approach through campaigning to have nations (particularly migrant receiving countries) ratifying the UN Convention on Migrant Workers. Sarah Biddulph spoke on the changing patterns for regulating internal migration in China and how that had changed over the past fifty years. This has involved a slow but tacit recognition of the reality of internal labour migration in China and that less punitive approaches were necessary and that changes were slowly occurring. Saw Min Lwin provided an overview of the general situation of migrant workers from Burma and noted that the case of some two million migrant workers in Thailand was in inexorably linked to the political repression in Burma.

The afternoon session looked at the specific experiences of migrant workers in different situations. Kathy Richards looked at migrant worker trafficking and its associated corruption. Teresa O'Connell focussed on migrant sex workers in U.S. Military Camps in Korea, and Anne Loveband used the response to the SARS outbreak in Taiwan as a very tangible way to understanding the difficulties that foreign domestic workers have in having their rights recognized. All three papers highlighted the vulnerability that migrant workers experienced in the host countries.

In the morning of the August 8 Michele Ford and Wahyu Susilo looked at the specific case of Indonesia and the migrant worker rights issues in Indonesia a labour exporting country. Professor Chowdury Arbrar looked at the role of institution building and the labour recruitment process in Bangladesh and how these could be strengthened to provide better outcomes for migrant workers from Bangladesh. Patrick Kilby concluded the workshop with a paper looking at the role of development assistance in migrant labour programs and how aid has generally not been directed to improving migrant labour programs despite their importance for so many economies in the Asia Pacific region.

Not only were the participants challenged by the papers presented but also the quality of discussion and the issues raised have provided direction for future work in the area of migrant labour rights. The papers are being edited as a result of the discussion and will be put together into a special issue of a journal such as "International Migration Review" or "International Migration" or "The Human Rights Quarterly". It is expected to have the final edited papers by October 2003.

top

NEW REGNET BUILDING

Work is progressing well on the building and the proposed move is planned for February/March 2004. RegNet, Law Program and the Centre for Tax System Integrity, RSSS will occupy the top two floors of the building (60) offices plus meeting spaces). The bottom floor will be teaching space mainly used by the Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies. Ideas for naming the building are still being considered and are welcomed.

top