Image source: Max Braun (Flickr)

Lopsided China-Australia Free Trade Agreement

21st June 2015

You might also like

In this Sydney Morning Herald opinion piece, Kyla Tienhaara and University of Toronto’s Gus Van Harten ask why the government has signed a treaty before completing the treaty negotiations. The ‘bizarre’ development opens the way for problematic ISDS clauses and sets the scene for a ‘lopsided’ China-Australia Free Trade Agreement, Tienhaara and Van Harten argue.

They suggest holding the government to account by asking the following three questions:

  1. Why did the government accept an investment chapter that is unequal on market access and non-discrimination, in China’s favour?

  2. Why did the government punt the most controversial aspects of ISDS to a future committee?

  3. Why did the government ensure it could keep key documents and hearings in ISDS – especially in Chinese investors’ claims against Australia – from the public?

Read the entire article in the Sydney Morning Herald.

Tags: ISDS

Updated:  10 August 2017/Responsible Officer:  Director, RegNet/Page Contact:  Director, RegNet